|
3 pts |
2 pts |
1 pt |
0 pt |
| Development
Of Ideas
|
Well-developed
ideas; introduces new ideas; stimulates discussion |
Developing
ideas; sometimes stimulates discussion |
Poorly
developed ideas; does not add to the discussion |
Did
not enter the discussion |
| Evidence
of Critical Thinking |
Clear
evidence of critical thinking (application, analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation. Postings are clarity of argument, depth of insight into
theoretical issues, originality of treatment, relevancy, and sometimes
include unusual insights and flashes of brilliance. Arguments are well
supported
|
Beginnings
of critical thinking. Postings tend to address peripheral issues.
Generally accurate, but could be improved with more analysis and creative
thought. Tendency to recite fact rather than address issues
|
Poorly
developed critical thinking
|
Did
not enter the discussion
|
| Response
to instructor and other students
|
|
Interacts
at least twice with the instructor and/or other students
|
Interacts
at least once with either the instructor or other students
|
Did
not enter the discussion
|
| Adherence
to deadlines
|
|
At
least 2 messages were posted before the deadline
|
At
least 1 message was posted after the deadline
|
Did
not post any messages
|
|